Skip links

Advice, affect, and you may candidate sex for the U

Advice, affect, and you may candidate sex for the U

101 . Newhagen , John Elizabeth. , “Past mind-report: Playing with latency to resolve model issue responding techniques on the web-centered public-opinion studies,” from the Sourcebook to own Governmental Telecommunications Browse , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you will Lance Holbert , Roentgen. ( New york : Routledge , 2011 ).Google College student

102 . Oxley , Douglas R. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John Roentgen. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and you will Hibbing , John Roentgen. , “Political perceptions vary which have mental characteristics,” Research , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Are feminine very likely to choose getting women’s circumstances debts than just the men associates?” Legislative Degree Quarterly 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Student

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The real difference Feminine Create: The insurance policy Feeling of women when you look at the Congress ( il : College out-of Chicago Force , 2002 ).Bing College student

105 . Mountain , Kim Quaile and you can Hurley , Patricia Good. , “Symbolic speeches throughout the You.S. Senate in addition to their representational implications,” Diary of Politics 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Is always to blacks represent blacks and you can female represent female? An effective contingent ‘yes’,” Diary from Government 1999 , 61 ( step 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-associated political degree therefore the detailed sign of women,” Governmental Decisions 2003 , twenty-five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Could there be a good ‘gender affinity effect’ when you look at the American government? S. Home elections,” Political Research Every quarter 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Student

This particular article might have been cited of the following guides. Which listing is done based on data available with Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney A good. and you may Lust, Ellen 2015. Could it possibly be Gender, Religiosity or Both? A role Congruity Principle out of Candidate Electability within the Transitional Tunisia. Viewpoints towards the Politics, Vol. 13, Situation. 1, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole M. 2015. Just who stereotypes female people? Distinguishing personal variations in women stereotype reliance. Politics, Communities, and you will Identities, Vol. step 3, Matter. 1, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The fresh role away from gender in the descriptive icon,” Governmental Research Every quarter 1995 , forty eight : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, Young Mie Knisely, Sandra and you will McLeod, Douglas 2015. Whenever feminine assault. Government therefore the Lives Sciences, Vol. 34, Situation. step 1, p. forty two.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and you may Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Delivering mixed indicators: the latest character from gender and you may partisanship in the analysis out-of politicians. Diary off Elections, Public-opinion and Events, Vol. 26, Matter. cuatro, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and you will Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. With Cardio and (No) Notice? How Readers Adversely Infer Missing Information about Political leaders as well as how Which Influences new Review of one’s Speakermunication Lookup, Vol. 43, Question. eight, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you will Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Deciding Thinking out-of Feminine Political leaders: The situation out-of Poland. Government in Central Europe, Vol. fourteen, Thing. 3, p. eight.

Schneider, Monica C. and you will Bos, Angela L. 2019. Using Societal Role Theory with the Examination of Gender in Politics. Political Mindset, Vol. forty, Point. S1, p. 173.

Playground, Sunshine Younger and you can Baek, Younger Minute 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence to your Feminine Politicians: Why Ambivalence Matters to have Gender Equivalence when you look at the an effective Democracy. Diary of women, Government & Plan, Vol. 40, Point. 2, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Reputation Murder and you can Feamales in Government. Corvinus Record away from Around the globe Circumstances, Vol. 4, Question. step 1, p. fifteen.

Aaldering, Loes and you can Van Der Jamais, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Leadership regarding News: Gender Prejudice inside the Commander Stereotypes during the Campaign and you will Program Times. United kingdom Record of Governmental Technology, Vol. fifty, Thing. step three, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. How can Customers Evaluate Roadway?Peak Bureaucrats’ Love and you can Ability? An excellent Typology and you may Shot. Social Government Opinion, Vol. 80, Point. 4, https://kissbrides.com/hot-american-women/ p. 532.

Leave a comment

This website uses cookies to improve your web experience.
Explore
Drag